Vote NO on Question 3!

BAD FOR MAINE ANIMALS, ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY.

 

Due to the passage of L.D. 95 by the Maine legislature, this November, Mainers will vote on Question 3 to amend the state constitution to include a “right to food.”   On the surface, the ballot question seems innocuous, but the vague language of the proposed amendment has the potential to create legal challenges to local statutes that address animal neglect/cruelty, environmental protection, wildlife conservation as well as, public health and safety.

During the legislative process, many voiced concerns about the proposed language of this amendment (detailed concerns included below). At the public hearing, the Maine State Director for HSUS proposed amended language that would have kept the intent of the of the “Right to Food” initiative intact, while ensuring adherence to existing and future animal welfare, wildlife conservation, and environmental protection standards.  The proposed amendment was not considered by the legislative committee, nor were the concerns of other stakeholders addressed prior to passage by the Maine legislature.

MFOA fully supports the concept of food security for all citizens.  However, the ambiguous language of the proposed “Right to Food” constitutional amendment does little to achieve this goal.  Additionally, as written, this proposal fails to require adherence to state laws and municipal ordinances that protect animals, the environment and public safety,while exercising the right to “grow” or “harvest” food of one’s own choosing.   As constitutional laws preempt state laws and local ordinances, we are deeply concerned by this omission.  As a result, MFOA stands in opposition to Question 3.

It is now up to us, advocates and citizens, to defeat this poorly-crafted, over-reaching, unnecessary and potentially dangerous constitutional amendment.  Please read on to see how you can take action.

 

MAINE STAKEHOLDER CONCERNS RE: “RIGHT TO FOODAMENDMENT

Maine Friends of Animals:

“The amendment is vague to the point it creates more questions than it provides answers. An example is the negative impact it could have on animal welfare including noncompliance with safety statutes and best practices for raising farm animals, enforcement of Maine wildlife protection laws, and it may even undermine the welfare laws that safeguard our companion animals. This constitutional amendment is not only unnecessary, it is flawed, vague, inadequately researched, and misleading even in its title. It needs to be defeated.” 

Maine Veterinary Medical Association:

The intention of the amendment is unclear, except to be designed to opening the door to all manner of animal abuse and neglect in the name of food. …MVMA members work tirelessly to ensure Mainers have access to safe food, and that the animals involved in that process are well cared for, properly treated, and healthy themselves. A constitutional amendment worded in this vague manner only impedes those goals.”

Humane Society of the United States:

“We do not think it is the intent of this proposal to allow food producers and and/or hunters, trappers, and fisherman be exempt from animal welfare and cruelty laws, but as currently written that would likely be the case as the current list of limitations fails to include any reference to such laws. …The inclusion of the terms “raise,” “harvest,” and “of their own choosing” could also result in a constitutional right for the consumption of species that are not viewed as food animals, such as cats and dogs or some wildlife species.”

Animal Rights Maine:

“Codifying hunting, farming, and fishing rights in our Constitution would render all future efforts to improve our relevant state laws a Constitutional matter, with much higher thresholds to meet to pass improvements into law.”

Maine Municipal Association:

“If passed by the body and the voters in November, it will be for the courts to decide whether a municipal ordinance for phosphorous mitigation, urban livestock farming restrictions, local pesticide ordinances or restrictions on timber harvesting, shoreland zoning setbacks are too restrictive to allow an individual to grow food or save seeds.

 

Speak up for humane treatment of animals.  No to Right to Food.

HOW YOU CAN HELP:

  1. Vote “NO” on Question 3 in November.  Ask fellow animal lovers and environmentalists to do the same.
     
  2. Write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper to educate other citizens of the potential unintended consequences of Question 3. 
     
  3. Contact your legislators to ask that they take a public stand against this vague and dangerous constitutional amendment.  Although the time for legislative intervention has passed, our representatives and senators have the power to educate and influence their constituents. Please request that they do so.
    Find your Senator
    Find your House Representative
     
  4. Share this alert via email and on social media.

    Please take a stand!  We have made steady progress to protect Maine animals,but there is much more to accomplish.  We must not go backwards and need to safeguard a path forward for improved animal protection in Maine.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:

 

DONATE TODAY!

Organizing effective campaigns, passing legislation and fighting animal abuse takes money. Please consider making a donation, large or small, today to support our efforts on behalf of Maine animals!

Donate online or mail your needed and greatly appreciated contribution to MFOA, 190 US Route 1, Falmouth, ME 04105.

To keep up-to-date on animal related issues in Maine, please follow us on Facebook.

SUPPORT MFOA

 

Share

© 2021 Maine Friends of Animals | 190 U.S. Route 1, Falmouth, Maine USA 04105 | 207-781-2187

web site design and hosting by Artopa, LLC | login